Pulaski Gas and Water

Customers served

Active accounts as Pulaski Gas and Water reported them in its Annual Information Report to the Tennessee Comptroller's Board of Utility Regulation, filed April 14, 2026. Every publicly owned water, sewer and gas system in Tennessee files the same form once a year. The Comptroller publishes it as filed and does not audit it.

The eight nearest systems by water customers

1. Lauderdale County Lauderdale 3,804
2. Metropolitan Government of Hartsville and Trousdale County Trousdale 3,787
3. Bean Station Utility District Grainger 3,749
4. Pulaski Giles 3,664
5. Munford Tipton 3,634
6. Jefferson City Jefferson 3,630
7. Newbern Dyer 3,594
8. Millington Shelby 3,550
9. Centerville Hickman 3,530

Nearest by water customer count among the 390 systems that reported water service. Bold row is Pulaski Gas and Water; a linked name is another utility at the conference. Counts are each system's own most recent filing, so filing dates differ by a few months.

Water loss against the state's 40% line

The Board of Utility Regulation opens a water loss case on any system whose non-revenue water, the water it supplied minus the water it sold, is 40% or more by volume. It calculates that from the Annual Information Report. Pulaski Gas and Water filed 1,313.0 million gallons supplied and 959.9 million gallons sold for its last fiscal year, filed April 14, 2026.

Same eight systems, water loss

1. Lauderdale County 33.2%
2. Metropolitan Government of Hartsville and Trousdale County 32.2%
3. Bean Station Utility District 40.9%at or above 40%
4. Pulaski 26.9%
5. Munford 7.7%
6. Jefferson City 30.0%
7. Newbern 37.0%
8. Millington 5.8%
9. Centerville 47.7%at or above 40%

the 40% linescale 0 to 50%

Non-revenue water is leaks, meter error, unbilled and unauthorised use. Water sold includes wholesale sales to neighbouring systems. A negative figure means a system filed more water sold than supplied. All figures as filed; the Comptroller does not audit them. The Board's own water loss review uses the AWWA audit worksheet, which a referred system files separately.

The bill for 5,000 gallons

The same filing asks each system what it bills a residential customer for 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 gallons in a month. Pulaski Gas and Water's answer, filed April 14, 2026, beside the median of every Tennessee water system that answered and the eight nearest by size.

Same eight systems, 5,000 gallons

1. Lauderdale County $47.00
2. Metropolitan Government of Hartsville and Trousdale County $48.74
3. Bean Station Utility District $53.30
4. Pulaski $30.28
5. Munford $24.09
6. Jefferson City $28.10
7. Newbern $19.15
8. Millington $42.15
9. Centerville $69.62

Water charges only, inside-city or standard residential rate as each system chose to report it; sewer and gas are not in these figures. A few systems that sell only wholesale file a nominal amount, which pulls the state median down a little. As filed; the Comptroller does not audit it. If Pulaski Gas and Water's figure is not what a customer pays, use the correction form and it will be fixed against your rate schedule.

Years since the last rate study

The filing asks when a third party last studied the rates. Pulaski Gas and Water answered one year ago. Of the 459 systems filing, 137 said more than five years and 39 said never.

1. Under 1 year 77
2. 1 yearPulaski Gas and Water 60
3. 2 years 45
4. 3 years 31
5. 4 years 42
6. 5 years 28
7. More than 5 137
8. Never 39

The Board recommends a rate study at least every five years and orders one for a system in financial distress. Answers as filed.

Where Pulaski Gas and Water sits

Giles County holds most of Pulaski Gas and Water's customers. Giles County's government is not at the conference, so it has no page of its own here.